Kenneth Cole New York Taupe Tic Slim Fit Slacks

Kenneth Cole New York Taupe Tic Slim Fit Slacks

Reg.

$149.99

$149.99

Description & Features

— Pant size: - waist

COLOR

TAUPE TIC

Description & Features

With their streamlined silhouette, these wool-blend, flat-front slacks have a modern look. The precision fit and performance fabric add comfort for easy wearability.

  • Wool-poly-spandex blend
  • Flat front
  • Lined to the knee
  • Pre-finished bottom
  • Slim Fit
  • Imported
  • Dry Clean Only

TMW_260K_76

Pack Light, Pack Right

Fall Trends.

Casual Jacket Article

The versatility of a casual jacket. Your layering essential. Read it.

Kenneth Cole New York Taupe Tic Slim Fit Slacks is rated 3.1429 out of 5 by 7.
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Charcoal tic slim fit slacks. As expected this slack stimulate the senses, but does not necessarily have an instantaneous instinct when dealing with the next purchase.
Date published: 2014-04-21
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Kenneth Cole Slim Fit Slacks Very pleased with my purchase. I just wish I had purchased another pair at that time! Great quality and loo.
Date published: 2014-04-07
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Guess I Learned what Trim Fit Means Thought KCNY was a reasonably business-oriented slack product, particularly in this material. Assumed trim fit was similar to meaning in shirt sizes - wearable in the same dimensions as long as you're not obese in critical ares. I never in a million years would assume it meant the moral equivalent of "skinny jeans". Disappointed in KCNY, disappointed in MW. I ordered on line, picked it up in the store, and it never made it out the front door. Why in the world would a 42" waisted person want dress-skinny jeans??
Date published: 2014-04-05
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Misfit Very disappointed in these slacks.  I ordered "35wx32l which is the size my husband wears.  It is an odd size and very few makers have it.  This pair was perfect in quality, design but it was at least 2 inches too small in the waist.  I would like to believe that it was mislabeled, since it is hard to believe it could be that much different in cut than other 35wx32l slacks!
Date published: 2014-01-03